Quick Reference: CSS Framework Selection
For Custom Designs:
- • Tailwind CSS: Utility-first approach
- • Styled Components: CSS-in-JS
- • Emotion: Performant CSS-in-JS
For Rapid Development:
- • Bootstrap: Pre-built components
- • Bulma: Modern CSS framework
- • Foundation: Professional framework
For React Projects:
- • Material-UI: Material Design
- • Chakra UI: Simple and accessible
- • Ant Design: Enterprise components
CSS Frameworks
Styling solutions for modern web development
CSS frameworks provide pre-written CSS code to help you build responsive, consistent, and visually appealing websites faster. Choose based on your design needs, customization requirements, and development approach.
Framework Types
Utility-First
Provide low-level utility classes to build custom designs directly in HTML.
- • Tailwind CSS
- • Tachyons
- • Atomic CSS
Component-Based
Offer pre-built components and design systems for rapid development.
- • Bootstrap
- • Bulma
- • Foundation
Framework-Specific
Built for specific JavaScript frameworks with component libraries.
- • Material-UI (React)
- • Chakra UI (React)
- • Vuetify (Vue)
Popular CSS Frameworks
Tailwind CSS
Utility-First
Utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs
Key Features
- • Utility classes
- • Customizable
- • Small bundle
- • JIT compilation
Best For
- • Custom designs
- • Rapid prototyping
- • Component libraries
- • Modern web apps
Pros
- • Highly customizable
- • Small production builds
- • Great developer experience
- • No CSS conflicts
Cons
- • HTML can look cluttered
- • Learning curve
- • Requires build process
Bootstrap
Component-Based
Popular CSS framework with pre-built components and grid system
Key Features
- • Pre-built components
- • Responsive grid
- • JavaScript plugins
- • Themes
Best For
- • Rapid development
- • Admin dashboards
- • Business websites
- • Prototyping
Pros
- • Easy to learn
- • Comprehensive components
- • Large community
- • Good documentation
Cons
- • Generic look
- • Large file size
- • Hard to customize
- • jQuery dependency
Bulma
Component-Based
Modern CSS framework based on Flexbox with no JavaScript
Key Features
- • Flexbox-based
- • No JavaScript
- • Modular
- • Modern syntax
Best For
- • Modern layouts
- • Clean designs
- • CSS-only projects
- • Flexbox learning
Pros
- • No JavaScript required
- • Modern Flexbox
- • Clean syntax
- • Modular
Cons
- • Smaller community
- • Limited components
- • Less customization
Foundation
Component-Based
Advanced responsive front-end framework for professional websites
Key Features
- • Mobile-first
- • Semantic
- • Customizable
- • Accessibility
Best For
- • Professional websites
- • Complex layouts
- • Accessibility-focused
- • Enterprise
Pros
- • Highly customizable
- • Semantic HTML
- • Great for complex layouts
- • Accessibility focused
Cons
- • Steeper learning curve
- • Smaller community
- • More complex setup
Chakra UI
React Component Library
Simple, modular and accessible component library for React
Key Features
- • React components
- • Theme system
- • Accessibility
- • TypeScript
Best For
- • React applications
- • Design systems
- • Accessible UIs
- • TypeScript projects
Pros
- • Great developer experience
- • Accessibility built-in
- • TypeScript support
- • Themeable
Cons
- • React only
- • Opinionated design
- • Bundle size
Material-UI (MUI)
React Component Library
React components implementing Google's Material Design
Key Features
- • Material Design
- • React components
- • Theming
- • TypeScript
Best For
- • Material Design apps
- • React projects
- • Enterprise applications
- • Admin panels
Pros
- • Material Design compliance
- • Comprehensive components
- • Great documentation
- • TypeScript
Cons
- • Material Design only
- • Large bundle size
- • Opinionated styling